As the controversy revolving around
Mohammad (Mo) Kahn’s memorial continues in Amy Waldman’s fiction novel, The
Submission, I find a growing admiration for Claire Burwell. She remains the
sole member of the jury who experienced a personal loss on that dreadful day
when the towers fell on September 11th: the death of her husband
Cal. Nevertheless, she strongly supports Mo’s design for a memorial garden,
even after the reveal of his Islamic ethnicity. As debates regarding the
memorial continue, Claire stands behind her original selection, having faith in
Mo’s design and looking past his identity as a Muslim. Through her
characterization of Claire, Waldman shows what it truly means to not only stand
up for the right thing, but to have the courage to stand up alone. Claire’s
perseverance and belief in Mo’s design in the face of a society that
stereotypes the architect as a terrorist and an extremist inspire me, and
throughout the reading, she has become my favorite character. Even with the
constant pressure from the media and other outsiders to withdraw her support
for “the Muslim,” as society labels him, Claire refuses to change her original
stance (94). With society’s view of Mo as simply “the Muslim,” Waldman implies
the architect’s separation from the public, indirectly characterizing him as an
outcast. Despite this depiction of the man whose design she supports, Claire
continues to defend the loner. Conniving journalist Alyssa Spier thereafter claims
Claire “‘is sleeping with the enemy,’” using the negative connotation of
“‘enemy’” within a common cliché to create an accusatory tone toward Claire.
She attempts to convince Claire that she has taken the wrong stance on the
memorial issue. With this allegation, Claire finds herself internally
conflicted, not understanding the “fear…keeping her from owning her beliefs”
(122). Here, Waldman’s indirect characterization of Claire as apprehensive due
to the media’s finger-pointing makes the protagonist even more real and
relatable. I greatly identify with Claire’s efforts to remain strong in what
she truly stands for and I found it rewarding to watch Claire pull through yet
again. After numerous hurtful assertions regarding her character, Claire still
confesses to chairman Paul Rubin that she “‘wants the Garden as much as ever’”
(190). With this statement, Waldman indirectly characterizes Claire as
determined and willing to do whatever it takes to build Mo’s memorial. I wish I
could say that I saw more of myself in Claire, whose adamancy inspires me. I do
not see myself as one who can resist conformity. However, Waldman has shown me
and hopefully other conformers to stand behind what they believe in. She
reminds them to do the right thing, even if they must do it alone. I too,
encourage those who have conformed to a society that goes against their
personal beliefs to have the audacity to defend their own opinions.
This past week, I was told that "a leader is someone who will back their opinions 100%, despite the fact that it may be an unpopular decision." When I heard this, I immediately thought of Claire and her affiliation with Mo's design despite the negatively publicity that was also latched on. While I admire her constant bravery, I also sympathize with her as she is forced to face the entirety of New York City by herself.
ReplyDeleteStrong writing, Annie! Each of your entries give an in-depth look into how Waldman deals with sensitive issues. I like how you pull evidence and give a solid discussion of the implications the text has for you.
ReplyDeleteYou need to come up with a solid title for your blog, though. Pronto!